{"id":18386,"date":"2023-10-07T16:10:18","date_gmt":"2023-10-07T19:10:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/?post_type=tnc_col_4706_item&#038;p=18386"},"modified":"2023-11-15T11:21:28","modified_gmt":"2023-11-15T14:21:28","slug":"amazonia-indigena-a-floresta-como-sujeito","status":"publish","type":"tnc_col_4706_item","link":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/periodicos-cientificos\/amazonia-indigena-a-floresta-como-sujeito\/","title":{"rendered":"Amaz\u00f4nia ind\u00edgena: a floresta como sujeito"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Cultivada, manejada pelos humanos durante mil\u00eanios, a floresta amaz\u00f4nica alterou-se, tornou-se \u2018outra\u2019, sem deixar de ser floresta; manteve a sua autonomia de sujeito \u2013 sujeito da sua pr\u00f3pria renova\u00e7\u00e3o e reprodu\u00e7\u00e3o. Em outras palavras, a Amaz\u00f4nia tornou-se \u2018antropog\u00eanica\u2019 \u2013 a um s\u00f3 tempo cultural e natural, fruto de uma rela\u00e7\u00e3o de m\u00e3o dupla entre sujeitos: o Homem e a Floresta, na qual a a\u00e7\u00e3o de um n\u00e3o anula a do outro. Gra\u00e7as \u00e0 Antropologia, sabemos que as sociedadesind\u00edgenas da Amaz\u00f4nia conferem dignidade de pessoa ou sujeito aos n\u00e3o humanos. A rela\u00e7\u00e3o entre sujeitos (sim\u00e9trica, de troca e reciprocidade) \u00e9 uma rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9tica e tamb\u00e9m po\u00e9tica. Por outro lado, o que prevalece na civiliza\u00e7\u00e3o ocidental\u00e9 a rela\u00e7\u00e3o sujeito-objeto (assim\u00e9trica, autorit\u00e1ria, de poder e domina\u00e7\u00e3o), da qual se origina a Natureza-objeto, em oposi\u00e7\u00e3o ao Homem-sujeito, \u00fanico detentor de Cultura. Ora, \u2018o outro como objeto\u2019 \u00e9 a nega\u00e7\u00e3o do outro e a nega\u00e7\u00e3oda \u00e9tica. Nisso reside a alteridade radical dos modos de ser e pensar ind\u00edgenas com rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao Ocidente. Essa \u2018alteridade ind\u00edgena\u2019 tem, para n\u00f3s, valor de tesouro e sabedoria. H\u00e1, por\u00e9m, um Ocidente crian\u00e7a e poeta que se reconhece nospovos ind\u00edgenas e na sua experi\u00eancia de mundo.<\/p>\n<p>Managed and cultivated by humans for millennia, the Amazon rainforest was altered, but (as the subject of its own renovation) is still a forest. In other words, Amazonia became \u2018anthropogenic\u2019 \u2013 both cultural and natural, the result ofa two-way relationship between subjects: Man and the Forest, with the activities of one not nullifying those of the other. Thanks to anthropology, we know that the indigenous societies of Amazonia confer the dignity of a person or subjecton non-humans. The relationship between subjects (symmetrical, dialogic, reciprocal) is an ethical as well as poetical relationship. On the other hand, what prevails in western civilization is the subject-object relationship (asymmetrical, authoritarian, dominating), which generates Nature as an object, opposed to Man as a subject, the sole bearer of Culture. Meanwhile, \u201cthe other as an object\u201d means denying the other and denying ethics. This is the substance ofthe radical alterity of indigenous ways of being and thinking with regard to the West; this \u201cindigenous alterity\u201d for us is a treasure of wisdom. Yet there is a childlike, poetic West that recognizes itself in the indigenous people and in their experience of the world.<\/p>\n<p>Keywords: Non-human subjects; Ethical and poetical relationship; Indigenous alterity; Anthropogenic Amazonia; Amazonian wisdom<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":5007,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","blocksy_meta":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item\/18386"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tnc_col_4706_item"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18386"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item\/18386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18432,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item\/18386\/revisions\/18432"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5007"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}