A constitui\u00e7\u00e3o da psicologia como profiss\u00e3o e \u00e1rea acad\u00eamico-cient\u00edfica se nutriu de saberes psicol\u00f3gicos presentes no campo cultural. A ci\u00eancia e a profiss\u00e3o desdobram tais saberes em aten\u00e7\u00e3o a demandas do campo social. Quando esses conhecimentos, pr\u00e1ticas e demandas s\u00e3o ing\u00eanua ou intencionalmente tomados como gerais e universais, h\u00e1 o risco de se reproduzir viol\u00eancias epist\u00eamicas, eliminando as oportunidades de partilha e contribui\u00e7\u00e3o dos diversos pontos de vista culturalmente situados na constru\u00e7\u00e3o daquilo que, desdobrando tradi\u00e7\u00f5es greco-romanas, judaicas e crist\u00e3s vem sendo nomeado como psicologia. Diante dos 60 anos da regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o da Psicologia no Brasil, embora nas \u00faltimas d\u00e9cadas tenha havido algum esfor\u00e7o de escuta das demandas ind\u00edgenas, em Pindorama ainda h\u00e1 um longo percurso para que as contribui\u00e7\u00f5es desses povos impliquem profundas retifica\u00e7\u00f5es sem\u00e2nticas, implicando revis\u00f5es conceituais e te\u00f3rico-pr\u00e1ticas. Este artigo defende que qualificar a psicologia como ind\u00edgena visa oportunizar o di\u00e1logo de ind\u00edgenas psic\u00f3logas e psic\u00f3logos, e quaisquer pessoas interessadas em refletir sobre o enraizamento dos conhecimentos e pr\u00e1ticas psicol\u00f3gicas nas tradi\u00e7\u00f5es que os originaram.<\/p>\n
As a profession and academic-scientific area, Psychology was nourished by psychological knowledge that circulate on the cultural sphere, which the discipline unfolds in practices to meet social demands. When this knowledge, these practices and demands are naively or intentionally taken as universal, we risk reproducing epistemic violence, suppressing opportunities for sharing and contribution by different points of view culturally situated in the construction of what, based on Greco-Roman, Jewish and Christian traditions has been called psychology. Sixty years after the regulation of Psychology in Brazil, despite the efforts made in the last decades to listen to the Indigenous demands, Pindorama has a long way to go before these contributions ensue deep semantic ramifications, leading to conceptual and theoretical-practical revisions. This paper argues that qualifying psychology as Indigenous aims to provide opportunities for dialogue for indigenous psychologists, other psychologists, and anyone interested in reflecting on the diverse roots of psychological practices.<\/p>\n
Dialogicity; Epistemic Violence; Indigenous Psychology; Ethnocentrism; Decolonization<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":5007,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","blocksy_meta":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item\/12253"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tnc_col_4706_item"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12253"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item\/12253\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12309,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tnc_col_4706_item\/12253\/revisions\/12309"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5007"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/patrimonio.art.br\/opocedoc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}